The following discussion has been moved from the page User talk:Metaknowledge. This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions. You mentioned a year ago about a bot for these Spanish adjectives.
You said that your bot "clunking thing" could process them. Is that option still there? I'm not allowed to run a bot anymore, sadly. At least, only if I run it very slowly. Could you take a look at this and see if you can make sense out of it? The definition as stands now is totally useless due to completely obsolete 19th-century terminology.
There are a few Google Books hits for the terms used, but you have to know enough biology to read between the lines and figure out what they're referring to in modern terms- and my high-school biology from 40 years ago doesn't cut it.
You're right. I'll be more careful in my next edits. Sorry about the confusion on the vote. I thought it was still open. I didn't look at the date until you just reverted it. Reguyla talk , 1 March UTC. Thank you for your edit. I'm from burma. My nationality is Myanmar. Government says Myanmar is not the name of a nationality. But it isn't true. There is not a language called Burmese. The word Burma belongs to many nationalities. Those nationalities have their own languages. A man created a word that belongs to nationalities in my country.
That word is Burma. Nay Win,dictator,wanted to erase people's memories about great leaders. That man was a great leader of my country. So,everything about him was deleted. But the word burma can't be deleted. So,Nay Win maked people believed that Burma belongs to only one nationality. It's just my thought about that word. I know I shouldn't do like this. But I want to know whether my thought is right or wrong.
